This link ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36926513/are-there-elisp-functions-that-list-markers-in-a-given-buffer) suggests there is not a good way to find all the markers associated with a buffer.
John ----------------------------------- Professor John Kitchin (he/him/his) Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:01 AM Maxim Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/07/2021 23:00, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > > Maxim Nikulin writes: > > > >> Ihor, did you get that numbers using emacs -Q? If not, I suspect you may > >> have twice more markers in the buffer than `org-refile-get-targets' > >> usually generates. If my guess is correct it may be necessary to file a > >> bug that org-ql or some other package abuses markers by generation to > >> much of them. > > > > With emacs -Q things are twice better, though still not good enough: > ... > > org-ql might be one of the reasons of slowdown. Without it, the nm-tst > > after clearing the cache is slightly faster (was 13 sec): > > 13.8 - 10.1 = 3.7 that is comparable with "emacs -Q" that is 5.3. So > contribution of org-ql is not major one, but it is still significant. > > > However, markers are also created by agendas for example. The last > > result is also on fresh Emacs. Fresh Emacs tends to be faster in general. > > > > Do you know a good way to find out all the markers associated with a > buffer? > > I was going to ask you, but forgot to do it. Perhaps it is impossible by > design. > > (length org-agenda-markers) > > >
