On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 8:50 AM Denis Maier <denisma...@mailbox.org> wrote:
> > Certainly in the CSL world, this has never been supported, and I don't > > ever recall it ever coming up (though I'm sure someone on the Zotero > > forum raised it at some point) > > I'm pretty sure I've brought that up at some point :-) :-) > FWIW, Biblatex knows a similar command \mancite. > > Use cases: > Beyond personal communication, which I personally have never used, there > are disciplines (classics, theology, religious studies) that refer to > some classical works (Bible, Quran, etc.) with certain well-known > abbrevations. Usually those works don't appear in the bibliography. The cases here a little different though. This is basically work so well-known in a field that they are omitted from the bibliography. Effectively, the opposite of "nocite"; so "nobib"? The example of personal communications that John raised is a little different. I still think it's either a citation with a reference, or it's not; just an in-text note. > This leads to problems with automatic citations, especially when you also use > "ibid." and such... > > Bla [cite:@doe]. > Blabla (Gen 1). > Bla [cite:@doe]. > > => > Bla (Doe 2020). > Blabla (Gen 1). > Bla (ibid.). > > > With biblatex you can use \mancite to reset the citation trackers. Can one workaround this now? Or if not, by adding a "nobib" style per above at some point? Bruce
