>>>>> Timothy <tecos...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Colin,
>> Nice work. For me, however, I’m still at a loss, although I
>> confess I’ve not kept up to-date with the org citation
>> developments.
>>
>> 1. I don’t understand the relation between the new cite syntax
>> and the old org-mode . Perhaps there isn’t one.
>>
>> 2. How is an `org-link-abbrev-alist' related to a global and/or
>> local #+bibliography:? Even if I remove reference to my
>> `org-link-abbrev-alist' the org-export (to pdf) still does not
>> find a different local bibliography file. (I have
>> org-cite-global-bibliography set to nil.)
> I think the confusion you have lies in the similarity between the
> link syntax and cite syntax — the new `[cite:@key]' citations are
> *not* links. Hopefully that makes them a this a bit clearer :)
Ah! Now that's helpful - thanks.
