On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 1:19 PM John Kitchin <jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> so, I guess I am in agreement that it is option 2, and that there needs to be > a single entry point for each one. +1 So I guess open questions: 1. a new syntax that mirrors cite (and accompanying new cross-reference element?), per Timothy's suggestion, or reuse cite? I still think a new syntax and element is cleaner, but depends in part on ... 2. if the former, what new code would be required, and can some from OC (and maybe org-ref??) be reused somehow? if the latter, what changes to the OC code? A related question on syntax is if one ever needs multiple sub-references, as one does multi-cite citations? I was assuming no, so a hypothetical new syntax could be simpler than citations, but IDK. Of course these questions are only relevant if the org maintainers are open to them also. BTW, I thought this earlier post from Joost Kremers was interesting and relevant: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2021-07/msg00238.html Bruce
