Hi Tim, Tim Cross <theophil...@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks Bastien. I think it is good to have a clear statement on this, > even if not everyone agrees, as it makes things explicit. I > suspect this will need to be reviewed after each release of a new Emacs > version though as the effort to maintain backwards compatibility will > depend on what has changed in Emacs. Especially given that Emacs release > cycles seem to be getting shorter. Indeed - Ihor already helped with testing backward compatibility, and yes, we shall certainly keep an eye on this. -- Bastien
