Juan Manuel Macías <maciasch...@posteo.net> writes: > Well, if I'm not mistaken, the situation in the LaTeX ecosystem is > this: Polyglossia appeared as a babel replacement for XelaTeX and > LuaLaTeX, since babel, at that time, had no support for these two > new Unicode based TeX engines.
And, as far as I remember, babel development had nearly ceased during that period. Since quite some years, the development has gained much more traction for babel and, as far as I read, babel is today as good or superior to polyglossia in many regards (but polyglossia is also in quite a good shape today). See for example: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/482396/decide-between-polyglossia-and-babel-for-lualatex-in-2019 In short: Babel is a very good choice in almost all cases, maybe except for right-to-left texts set with XeLaTeX. > But I think it does not make much sense to mantain in ox-latex.el > two separate lists today. Maybe, for simplicity, it would be better > to unify the two lists in a single db, something like > `org-latex-language-alist'. What do you think? +1 -- Until the next mail..., Stefan.
