Dear Eric,
>>>>> Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> Colin, I also only use the basics when writing articles. With the
> new org-cite, the closest I have is with the following settings,
> as an example:
> #+cite_export: natbib plain #+latex_header:
> \usepackage[numbers,sort,super]{natbib}
> #+bibliography: ~/[...]/bibliography.bib
> This converts the simplest [cite:@author] to \citep{author}.
> Natbib settings need to be adjusted to your tastes/needs, of
> course.
> In my org configuration, I have
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp (require 'oc-basic) (require 'oc-csl)
> (require 'oc-natbib) #+end_src
> to cover all the bases.
> I have not been able to get away from using natbib for LaTeX
> export, unfortunately. A simple basic bibtex org-cite exporter
> would be welcome, one that simply generates \cite{author} without
> any frills.
> It's important to highlight that, to me, the advantage of
> org-cite, over what I was using before with my own cite: link
> definition, is that changing that first line to something like
> #+cite_export: csl "[...]/acm-siggraph.csl"
> lets me export the same document to ODT or text with the
> citations. It's not something I need often but I did in fact need
> it just recently and was greatly welcome!
Thank you very much for your interesting reply. For "serious" work I've
always used only LaTeX, reserving org-mode for notes; consequently for
me, there not much motivation to get the new org-mode cite to
work. However I'll give your settings a try.
Best wishes,
Colin.
