Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > i should clarify. bulk archiving slows down even with /nonexistent/ > (have not tried empty) archives. as part of normal and expected > operation, bulk creates the archive for the first entry, and then > subsequent entries are added. those get slower and slower.
Hi. I just pushed a change that should solve the archiving speed. Feel free to try it out. Best, Ihor
