Timothy <tecos...@gmail.com> writes: > I’ve just pushed the change I described in 4514a32. This improves the > interpretation of :width attributes and makes a value of “t” work as > discussed. > I have not prioritised #+attr_org for now, but that sounds like a change we > could make in the future.
Thanks Timothy. However, I think this change may have some issues. It seems that it unbalances parentheses. This also no longer sets width (so, e.g., (floatp width) won't work). Maybe attr-width was intended to be renamed to width? Are you seeing the same? I've got an implementation for prioritizing #+attr_org, but I want to make sure your commit goes in the right way before I submit that. Matt