Hi Tom Am 04.12.2021 um 18:53 schrieb Tom Gillespie:
Hi all, After a bunch of rambling (see below if interested), I think I have a solution that should work for everyone. The key realization is that what we really want is the ability to have a "parse me separately" type of syntax. This meets the intra-word syntax needs and might meet some other needs as well.The solution is to make @@org:...@@ "parse me separately" block! It nearly works that way already too! To minimize typing we could have @@:...@@ the empty type default to org. This seems like a winner to me. The syntax for it already exists and won't conflict. It requires relatively minimal additional typing the implication is clear, and there are other places where such behavior could be useful. This syntax seems like a winner to me @@org:/hello/@@world @@:/hello/@@world You can also do things like #+begin_src org I want a number in this number@@org:src_elisp{(+ 1 2)}@@word! #+end_src Which would render to #+begin_src org I want a number in this number3word! #+end_src Thoughts? Best! Tom
Thanks for the suggestion. I think that sounds like a good idea. Of course not as terse as the asciidoc inspired suggestion, but entirely appropriate for a case like this one! I also like that there might be other cases where case might be handy.
Best, Denis
