Timothy <tecos...@gmail.com> writes: > For the sake of staying vaguely on-track, I think it’s worth noting that > Ihor’s > comments make no mention of changing the Org syntax, or creating an abstract > definition (that has existed as a WIP for years).
I think Dr. Babenhauser referred to another ongoing thread "Raw Org AST snippets for "impossible" markup". > There’s been a bit too much speculation[1] in this thread methinks… Yep, though it is still fairly relevant to some of the interpretations of the thread title. So, let it be. The discussion is not useless even though it is not the feedback I was counting on. I plan to open a new, more technical thread to discuss the changes I wanted to make. Best, Ihor
