Hello, I'm not sure what is the expected behaviour of the COMMENT keyword for TODOs and the agenda, since I only found it in the "Exporting" section of the manual, but I find the following behaviour inconsistent:
- Tasks with a COMMENT keyword or under a heading with a COMMENT keyword do not appear in the agenda. I'm not sure if this is a feature or just happens because there is a step involving exporting when the agenda is constructed, but it seems reasonable to me and I use the COMMENT keyword for this sometimes. - Tasks with a COMMENT keyword or under a heading with a COMMENT keyword DO matter when computing dependencies between tasks, when org-enforce-todo-dependencies is 't' or there is a 'ORDERED' property. These two points seem inconsistent to me, since the first leads me to believe that tasks under commented subtrees are as if they did not exist, but in the second we see that's not true. Am I interpreting the COMMENT keyword wrong? Best regards, Ignacio P.D: Just when I was going to send this I tried to investigate it a little bit more to not waste anyone's time, and I found the variable 'org-agenda-skip-comment-trees', which defaults to 't'. So now I see that if it is set to 'nil' it would not be inconsistent to me anymore, but I still think that the default behaviour is inconsistent, or at least unintituive for newcomers, and that maybe a corresponding variable like 'org-dependencies-skip-comment-trees' might be needed. Emacs : GNU Emacs 26.3 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.14) of 2020-03-26, modified by Debian Package: Org mode version 9.5 (9.5-g0a86ad @ /home/ignacio/.emacs.d/elpa/org-9.5/)