Max Nikulin wrote: > Have you seen the following and links therein? > https://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#closing-outline-sections
No, I hadn't found that. Thanks. Those links answer my question. Juan Manuel Macías wrote: > It is an interesting question; however, I would say that this is not a > useful or realistic structure. Regardless of the Org trees/subtrees and > their folding ability (indicating that each thing is at a certain > level), I think that a content will be more useful and intelligible if > […] I see your point. Maybe it depends on how you use org-mode and how you imagine the meaning of the "*" items. I see some disagreement about this in the old threads that Max linked to. No need to rehash it deeply here again; I was just curious. The way I'm using org-mode so far, I'm not exporting to other formats, and I can see a use for collapsible sections in the middle of a larger chunk of text. I can already kind of do it with a "-" list item, like this. (Or other things like code blocks, etc) * Heading Top Text Top Text - Sub This can be hidden if I hit 'tab' key on "Sub". More Top Text More Top Text If you view a "*" item as "book section", it's confusing. But if you view a "*" item as "collapsible thing", then it makes more sense.