On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:40:05AM +0000, Neil Jerram wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, 11:14 Russell Adams, <rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com> wrote: > > > Why not just do an ASCII export to a temporary read only buffer for > > viewing? > > Do you mean that you're agreeing with the concept, but finding the > implementation unnecessarily complicated?
I'm not being negative about the concept. I'm asking if the poster had considered using the built-in tools before creating another new library. I did a short look at the site and the assertion "view org with less markup", and that was my first impression. I had two thoughts. The first was if the markup is a problem and you want a read only view, why not use the built in ascii export to a buffer and view that buffer? I just hit C-c C-e t A and M-x read-only-mode and was able to navigate my ascii org file as a read only buffer. Second thought was that Org's syntax was supposed to minimize the markup so it didn't negatively impact reading. Maybe the poster is identifying a pain point we should be aware of as a community, ie: that too much markup makes it hard to read. My impression is only property drawers and source blocks are potentially visually loud compared to the other markup. Timestamps are pretty minimal and links already only show a descriptive text instead of the full [[]] syntax. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Russell Adams rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3 http://www.adamsinfoserv.com/ Fingerprint: 1723 D8CA 4280 1EC9 557F 66E8 1154 E018 1160 DCB3