Tyler Grinn <tylergr...@gmail.com> writes: > John Kitchin <jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes: > >> I like the variable idea. I would make it a concatenation string for >> joining. That way “” would concatenate the way Tyler wants, “ “ would >> preserve current behavior, and “,” could lead to a comma separated >> list for example. Other things like “\n” might lead to a column, etc. > > I'm not a huge fan of the variable idea because it would make it > impossible to include both behaviors in a single file, whereas extending > the syntax maintains any existing properties that used '+'.
I think I need to elaborate what I meant by "similar to org-use-property-inheritance". org-use-property-inheritance docstring: >>> When nil, only the properties directly given in the current entry >>> count. When t, every property is inherited. The value may also be a >>> list of properties that should have inheritance, or a regular >>> expression matching properties that should be inherited. Similarly, concatenation of PROPERTY+ can be controlled on per-property basis. Best, Ihor
