Ivar Fredholm <freddyho...@protonmail.com> writes: > A session-less block can be executed by starting a session with a special > name (say "*none") which always gets killed after block execution is > completed. For interpreter-less languages, we could use the shell as an > interpreter (for instance, if we wanted to execute C, we could just start a > shell, and send it the gcc command to compile and execute). Would this not > cut down the amount of code that needs to be maintained and uniformize the > existing code?
Feel free to compare ob-eval.el and ob-comint.el. Their functionality is not equivalent. In particular ob-eval.el has a better handling of errors. If you find a way to unify the two without loosing the functionality, it will be welcome. Best, Ihor
