Hello Ihor.
Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@gmail.com> writes: > Well. You convinced me. If Asymptote has very stable syntax and major > features, it probably makes more sense to maintain it within Org or > within Org community. If Bastien shows the green light, I am looking forward to giving back something to the community: maintanance and a good set of illustrative examples on worg. For the past 2 years I have just been utilizing what you guys have been doing, in a state of haze, for obvious reasons. >> - I embrace a (any) maintained feature which extends the >> applicability of Org without compromising "the core." I have had >> great moments noticing that Org already supports something new I >> need. > > I agree that it is nice, but we cannot, unfortunately support all the > programming languages out there. As long a some specific language has > a maintainer, things are fine, but in long term it is only reliable to > support popular ones + possibly GNU projects (as Org is a part of GNU, > and it is kind of obligation). Makes sense. As long as there is a maintainer, a more exotic language can be supported. Perhaps my contribution will increase the popularity of Asymptote within the Org community and therefore the probability of long term survival of ob-asymptote.el. > As long as there is a person maintaining ob-asymptote, things should > be fine. Especially if there is a good test coverage and WORG > documentation. I will be in standby mode until Bastien tells me what happens next. All the best, Jarmo
