András Simonyi <andras.simo...@gmail.com> writes: >> This is an important point. I think that we should describe this gotcha >> in the "Bibliography printing". oc-basic and oc-csl just print the list >> of bibliography entries, while oc-bibtex/oc-natbib/oc-biblatex insert a >> separate section. It is a very important information and users should be >> aware of it. > > I agree, so I've attached a new version in which a sentence is added > about this difference in behaviour.
Thanks! Applied onto main via 24d2826f0. https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=24d2826f049068e0d2afac19a2669a3ff8fdad6a > Also, this is kind of annoying - this way mixing oc-bibtex >> and oc-basic for LaTeX and non-LaTeX export gets awkward. > > Yes, in the long run we might want to unify the behaviour of the > processors in this respect. OTOH changing "basic" and "csl" to > automatically print a heading would be a breaking change, e.g., AFAIK, > ox-hugo currently adds a heading on its own when org-cite is used for > bibliography printing with the "csl" processor. Can we then change the oc-biblatex et al defaults to output \printbibliography[heading=none] ? Best, Ihor