On 11/08/2022 03:54, Hraban Luyat wrote:
On 8/3/22 11:55 AM, Max Nikulin wrote:
Do you mean to rewrite
(when bare (if x y bare))
to this?
(and bare x y)
If that's what you meant, I think it would evaluate differently if bare
= truthy and x = falsy, right? Form 1 evaluates to `bare', form 2
evaluates to x (i.e. NIL). Or did I misunderstand the suggestion?
You are right. I tried to suggest an expression that was wrong.
I am going to make another attempt:
(if (and bare
org-babel-tangle-use-relative-file-links
(string-match org-link-types-re bare)
(string= (match-string 1 bare) "file"))
(concat "file:"
(file-relative-name (substring bare (match-end 0))
(file-name-directory
(cdr (assq :tangle params)))))
bare)
I do not think that such code is dramatically clearer, but at least it
has 1 conditional form less.
