Rudolf Adamkovič <salu...@me.com> writes: > Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > >> I note that you did not mention in the news that MathJax 2 support is >> dropped. This is a very important thing we must highlight and ring all >> the bells about. > > Fixed. See the 8th revision of the patch attached below. Better?
Thanks! Yes, better. >> However, it could be at least a good idea to warn the users who are >> trying to use MathJax 2. Would it be possible? > > As far as I know, we have no reliable way of knowing the version of > MathJax without actually reading the JavaScript file, locally and > remotely. I see. Then, we probably cannot have automatic and full backwards compatibility anyway. Before we proceed with the merge, I'd like to ping Bastien in case if he has any objections. Bastien, this is a breaking change that potentially affects the users who use custom path to MathJax 2 in their config. Unfortunately, there is no way to introduce MathJax 3 yet not breaking things for such users. Is the current news entry is sufficient? Or should we do something in addition to announce backwards-incompatible change? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
