Rudolf Adamkovič <salu...@me.com> writes: > - e.g. "FILE<PROJECT>" from Project.el > - e.g. "*EGLOT (PROJECT/(MODE)) events*" from Eglot > - e.g. "magit-diff(FILE1 -- FILE2): PROJECT" from Magit > > All "normal looking" (spacing-wise), unlike e.g. "*Org Src FILE[ MODE ]*". > .... >> Could you list other packages that use Foo[bar] pattern in buffer names? > > Most packages use (), but I went with a minimal change, fixing just the weird > use of whitespace.
I see no logical reason why we should prefer " " over "". It does not sound any stronger than preferring "[" over "(". So, removing spaces is just a matter of preference. Since the proposed patch is just a matter of preference, considering that it may affect existing uses of `display-buffer-alist', I do not think that the change is justified. Unless we have a large number of users liking no spaces more. For now, I just updated the docstring to reflect the reality. https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=dd25e2704 Canceled. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>