Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@gmail.com> writes:

> Consider the following timestamp with a typo in starting minute:
> <2022-04-11 Mon 17:1-19:10>
> ...
> Expected: The example timestamp is not parsed as a valid timestamp, but
> rather considered a paragraph.

Upon further thinking, I do not think that the above should be parsed as
a paragraph. We are rather permissive about extra unrecognized text in
the timestamps - it is a feature.

I, however, added a low-trust linter that reports timestamps with
unexpected extra text.


Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>

Reply via email to