>>>>> Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes:
> Colin Baxter <[email protected]> writes:
>> > No objections have been raised.
>>
>> Well, you have not really given much time to respond.
> 2 weeks. I could have waited one month, but this is relatively
> safe breaking change.
>> Does this mean that all sub-heading with their TODOs will now
>> become habits? I would like much more information on the effects
>> of this proposal.
> Sorry if I was not clear in my original message.
> 1. STYLE will _not_ be inherited by default after the proposed
> change. 2. HABIT will be inherited if user customized
> `org-use-property-inheritance' to value of t (aka inherit all
> properties) 3. STYLE will be inherited if user explicitly added
> "STYLE" to `org-use-property-inheritance' when it is a list.
> Only (2) can be breaking.
Ok, that's good.
>> We have had `habits' for zillions of years which have worked
>> well. So why the change?
> To be able to dedicate a separate subtree or file to habits,
> automatically making all the sub-tasks habits without spamming
> property drawers setting :STYLE: habit.
Thank you very much. I understand.