can you think of any differences between bugfix and main that could result in
1) bugfix not producing certain agenda entries from the org outline (THE BUG) 2) with no obvious differences between the entries that show and the entries that do not 3) FROM A BATCH CALL. removing --batch from the emacs call removes the bug. i am merely hoping for an a priori idea about what might be different from bugfix to main so that i don't have to do what for unrealted reasons i cannot do at this time which is produce an ecm. 27.1. apologies for bad non-bug-report. === (info "(elisp) Startup Summary") says what --batch does differehtly from interactive. long ago i tried to make testcase be like normal emacs gui use. loads .emacs, which batch does not. i have no default library for batch to not run. i did not do the other stuff --batch does. recently adding (package-initialize) made no difference. so idk what --batch is doing or not doing to screw up the bugfix agenda but not main. batch maint has sorting differences from main, which i will presume are expected and fixable. === i wouldn't care about this issue but i like running my old regression script to ensure agenda works ok. -- The Kafka Pandemic A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy: https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com