Liu Hui <liuhui1...@gmail.com> writes: > I think your proposal about ":results graphics" is more flexible and > complies the documentation. Since the patch has no real problem and > the feature is useful indeed, I hope it can be merged instead of mine > after the problem of documentation is resolved.
Thanks for your gracious words. I will aim to revisit and finish this work in a month or so -- I'm swamped the next couple weeks, and anyways we first need to sort out the issues around documentation, back-compatibility, and general semantics of ":results graphics". > As for other features in the patch, maybe it is better to convert > dict/dataframe/array to table/list only when the result type is > explicitly set to table or list? Thanks, that is an interesting idea. Especially for dict, which can be interpreted in many ways, it is a good idea to make use of the table/list/etc type specifications.
