On 2023-09-02 09:10, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4...@vodafonemail.de> writes:
>> - Even if we made "&" mandatory, it would not really solve the quoting >> problem, since the parser is rather hacky and other quoting and >> context issues would still be there. > > But at this point you are more familiar with that parser than I am, so > my idea does not seem to be viable. I think so, yes. That would mean that my pending patch could be merged, right? (Sorry for being impertinent here, but I'd like to get that thing off my stack.)
