Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > David Masterson <dsmaster...@gmail.com> writes: > >> In worg-about, it looks like the repo is ~bzg/worg on src.ht, but "worg" >> doesn't come up in the project search on src.ht (but "org" does). Is >> the repo hidden (I don't have an account on src.ht yet -- perhaps >> sourcehut should be explained a bit in worg-about). > > May you please provide more details?
I'll try. > Do you refer to <https://orgmode.org/worg/worg-about.html>? Yes. > FYI, WORG is listed in "Repositories" right at https://sr.ht/~bzg/org/ I see no mention of "~bzg/org" in worg-about. I think my lack of experience for many years is showing -- I didn't think to click on the ~bzg/worg link which would've told me about ~bzg/org. I assumed the link was just telling me what to put on 'git clone'. Perhaps that should be explained a little more in worg-about. What I did was go to sr.ht to see what it looked like and maybe sign up for an account. I followed the "More Projects" link and searched for "~bzg/worg", but nothing came up. However, searching for "org" did bring up "~bzg/org". Being out of practice, I was confused. >>> Alternatively, perhaps the key element of "wiki" for some is "web >>> accessible editing", in which case I wonder if using EmacsWiki would >>> make sense. >> >> Duh! Why did I forget about EmacsWiki?!? Web accessible editing is a >> plus to allow organic growth to the wiki -- as long as some rules are >> followed. Wikis allow easy undoing of page edits (if necessary) and (I >> think) locking pages to be edited only by a few people (creator/admins). >> There could be a talk page for suggesting additions to a use-case to >> make it more flexible which the use-creator creator could test and >> incoporate into the use-case (or just tag it as interesting). > > Currently, we prefer all the discussions, including discussions of WORG > pages, to happen on this mailing list. And I'm beginning to warm to WORG's approach. I used FosWiki a long time ago which is different. > One interesting idea could be showing the comment threads right on the > WORG pages, similar to > https://isso-comments.de/ > https://staticman.net/ > https://meta.discourse.org/t/embed-discourse-comments-on-another-website-via-javascript/31963 > https://amnesiak.org/post/2021/01/30/hugo-blog-with-mastodon-comments-extended/ These each look interesting. > Or we might consider https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/woof to automatically update > WORG pages for appropriately marked mailing list threads. Hmm. That sounds most interesting becuase it command line driven. Perhaps a new mailing list should be created for this? -- David Masterson
