Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: >> https://gitlab.com/jackkamm/org-grouped-weektree >> >> I'd appreciate feedback on 2 points: >> >> 1. Are any of these datetree formats worth upstreaming into org-mode >> proper? > > That would make sense. > >> 2. Can we add a public interface for `org-datetree--find-create', and >> are there any suggestions on how to do it? >> >> Regarding #2, an ugly aspect of my current implementation is the abuse >> of the private function `org-datetree--find-create'. I also pass in >> the week or quarter for the DAY and MONTH arguments of this function, >> though I note that `org-datetree-find-iso-week-create' does something >> similar in its implementation. > > The API of `org-datetree--find-create' is generally very limiting. > It would be nice to come up with something less limiting.
Thanks for the feedback -- I'll start working on something along these lines. Though this might take me a little while since the holiday is ending soon :''-(