Christian Barthel <b...@online.de> writes:
> On the other hand: There are ways to specify the
> ordering like org-reverse-note-order. Would it make
> sense to have one global `org-reverse-order' that is
> dealing with reversing "everything" that is somehow
> dependent on ordering?
The problem is that it is not very clear what to do when:
org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift docstring:
If the original subtree did contain time stamps with a repeater,
the following will happen:
...
- the original entry will be placed *after* all the clones, with
repeater intact.
So, the change is not trivial.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
