Juan Manuel Macías <maciasch...@posteo.net> writes: > Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez writes: > >> I agree it does not take advantage of the AUTO facility here, but I >> nevertheless think it would >> be interesting to show people how to do this. Until we expand the AUTO >> facility to cope with >> all quirks of multi-language in pdflatex (lualatex and xetex are a >> different pair of shoes), a quick >> and dirty alternative may be helpful for people. The introductory text >> could be > > Pedro, the only problem I see with that is that it is an example of > LaTeX rather than Org. The only Org part here is #+LaTeX_header, and in > the entire section it's already made clear enough what it's used for. > > Perhaps a brief reminder (the AUTO facility of the previous examples > is very limited) could be added first, and that if the users want to > obtain more complex, or more specific results (like the case you > exemplify for pdfLaTeX) they must put explicit LaTeX code, using > LaTeX_header. And then your example would come, but emphasizing that the > LaTeX documentation must be consulted. wdyt? > > My point is that if we abuse examples of this type (at the expense of > "#+latex_header:something"), or "how is this done in LaTeX?", in the end > a LaTeX manual is made instead of Org.
A gentle ping. This patch is still hanging in the air. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
