Suhail Singh <suhailsingh...@gmail.com> writes: > Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > >> Next, if you are not interested in adding :textarea support, it is >> OK. Adding #+ATTR_HTML support for code blocks and fixed width elements >> will still be a welcome improvement (I was just hoping to push you to >> contribute a bit more ;)) >> >> Now, back to your original patch. >> May you please factor out adding attributes into a separate function, so >> that we avoid duplicating the code? And please announce the change in >> the news - people aware of the current behavior might need to know about >> the change. > > Given that I already have some contributions in Org mode and I don't, at > present, intend to do the copyright assignment to FSF, ... > > From a feasibility perspective, I suspect it might be better for you (or > someone else who's signed the FSF copyright assignment paperwork) to > take on the work of applying changes that are similar in spirit to the > patch.
I was checking up to see what the current status of this issue was when I noticed that it doesn't show up in the "Woof!" tracker as I would expect. Both <https://tracker.orgmode.org/bugs?search=attr_html> and <https://tracker.orgmode.org/requests?search=attr_html> don't yield any results, though <https://tracker.orgmode.org/patches?search=attr_html> does. Are patches not allowed to be bugs or requests as well? -- Suhail
