Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: >> Hopefully, the description of each action will be a first-class member >> of the "List of possible actions". Or is the intent that the >> description be taken from the form representing an action (e.g. a defun, >> a lambda etc). > > Using a docstring sounds like a good idea. But it is a bit early to > decide these details. I'd like to discuss the more general design first.
I agree that it may be premature to think about implementation details of how docstrings are stored etc. However, I would like to ensure that any discussion of the design of ways-to-choose-an-action-at-point include self-documentation and self-discovery in the desiderata. Perhaps this goes without saying, in which case please ignore this message. However, it's too important to be left to chance. -- Suhail
