Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <paag...@gmail.com> writes: > yes, the patch is just a step towards consistency, but I think is is an > important one, because it > makes org-mode not generate illegal/faulty LaTeX code.
Right, but it is also kind of half-way between "Org export default" and "LaTeX" behaviors. If it is expected in LaTeX that unnumbered sections do not go into TOC, why should ALT_TITLE make them go there? Is it something expected for LaTeX users? > As for the photo-finish, I have been thinking the following that we can use > the 'toc' document property. > > Values nil and t work as intended in all backends. This means rewriting > this part in ox-latex.el. > Additionally, we add a new value 'toc:latex' to keep the current behaviour > in ox-latex (at least, other backends could also implement it). > Coming from the LaTeX world, I lean towards the current ToC handling in > ox-latex.el (once fixed). It is closer to what I have been doing for the > last couple of decades ;-) Depending on the answer to my question above, we may or may not be able to apply your existing patch right away. I do not yet have a clear picture what toc:latex should look like -- never put unnumbered headings into TOC? Only put them when there is ALT_TITLE? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
