I assume that you meant to say that it is non-trivial to support sorting by timestamp *time*, since sorting by timestamp date is already the thing that is happening.
I will submit a patch, since I seem to have something working locally that isn't too complex. Charles On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 1:52 PM Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote: > Charles Tam <m...@charlest.net> writes: > > > Well that's the problem I'm talking about, right? time-up/down does > respect > > time-of-day, but a bunch of other sort strategies *don't*, like > > scheduled-up/down (see example for bug reproduction in previous message). > > Yes, they do not. > I recently clarified this in the docstring: > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=87c71e62901b84e77b79e68b89027a5b1ce6057c > It is not a bug, but rather a missing feature. > > Unfortunately, it is non-trivial to support sorting by timestamp date. > But patches will be welcome. > > -- > Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, > Org mode maintainer, > Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. > Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, > or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92> >
