Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > David Masterson <dsmaster...@icloud.com> writes: > >> Also, I note the use of 'top level' in "2.1 Headlines" and would >> probably replace it with 'first level' to keep with the numbering >> scheme. > > No, because > > ****** Is a top level headline when there are no other parent > headlines
Whoa. Not said in 2.1. And that would suggest that: ****** top level ******* 2nd level ****** top level ***** ??? How would this play with org-export-headline-levels (the original question)? Should "top level" in this case be '6' or '5'? A little confusing. -- David Masterson
