Morgan Smith <morgan.j.sm...@outlook.com> writes: > I hit a roadblock trying to figure out how best to implement your > suggestion. > > After running something like this: > > (setopt org-tags-sort-function (org-tags-sort-hierarchy-by > org-sort-function)) > > The help buffer for `org-tags-sort-function' displays a lambda as the > value which isn't very helpful. It also isn't conducive to users using > the customize interface (I think? I'm not going to pretend I actually > use that thing). > ... > Maybe I'm thinking too hard about this but it feels to me like it should > be a solved problem. How would you do this?
Hmm. I think we can do it differently. Rather than trying to do secondary sorting in `org-tags-sort-hierarchy...' we can allow `org-tags-sort-function' to be a list of functions. Then, when sorting, if (sort-function a b) and (sort-function b a) return the same value (which means that a=b wrt a given sort-function), we try second sort function in the list, and so on. It will be (1) more universal; (2) follow our existing practice in `org-agenda-sorting-strategy'. WDYT? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
