Kristoffer Balintona <krisbalint...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, May 05 2025, Kristoffer Balintona wrote:
> It would be nice if the top-level datetree in <file-spec> would simply > be used if the function supplied for function-returning-list-of-strings > returns nil. Alternatively, a target specification like > (file+olp+datetree function-returning-file-path-and-olp) > or > (file+olp+datetree list-of-file-path-and-olp) > would suffice. > > Are such changes desirable? If they are, I could try preparing a patch, > but looking at org-capture-set-target-location, I'm not sure how easy > this would be easy. That would be logical, I think. Not just for file+olp+datetree, but then also for file+headline and file+olp. > Seems like the attached diff can accomplish this, though I'm not sure if > it's the most elegant solution. > ... > - (apply #'org-capture-expand-olp > expanded-file-path outline-path)))) > ... > + (outline-path (if (functionp (car outline-path)) > + (funcall (car outline-path)) > + outline-path)) We should keep outline path processing inside `org-capture-expand-olp'. Duplicating logic is a bad idea. Otherwise, something along those lines, yes. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
