Patch v5 (fbed0861) of org-protocol.org <http://org-protocol.org/> rewrite. > > Thank you very much for your careful attention to feedback, Charles! And > thanks to Max for yesterday's careful review, which covered everything I > spotted and quite a bit I didn't. > > I think this patch is ready to be applied, and that any further > refinement can be done against Charles' rewrite as the new baseline. > I'll merge it tomorrow night if there's no objection or new patch.
A pleasure to finally update this page for the Org community. I look forward to seeing this in the wild. Attached below is a patch which reflects comments from Christian. > Like Max, though, I think repeating the template twice feels redundant. > Perhaps the same pedagogical effect could be achieved by keeping the > longer example and demarcating the template sexp with a comment line? Removed the single entry capture template example, added demarcation comments. > > Btw, given that the car of a capture template is supposed to be a one- > or two-character key for template selection, it's fascinating that the > string "capture" works as a key for Org protocol capture (but fails to > be shown in the interactive capture template selection dialog, which is > convenient in this case). > While I have been using this behavior of long key names to omit Org protocol capture templates from capture template selection, I wonder if this intended design or an incidental implementation. Thanks again to Max and Christian for your feedback. All my best - Charles
0001-org-protocol.org-Rewrite-for-2025.patch
Description: Binary data
— Charles Y. Choi, Ph.D. kickingve...@gmail.com
