This change was suggested in <87wm8cfgjn.fsf@localhost>, but I forgot to
change this test in the subsequent revisions unfortunately.From 690189fc63309a70de6535f168bf58b45a9323bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Epple <em...@lukasepple.de>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 15:37:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] test-ox-html.el (ox-html/html5-fancy-timestamps): use
search-forward
* testing/lisp/test-ox-html.el (ox-html/html5-fancy-timestamps):
Since a full string is expected to part of the output, using rx is
overkill. Switch to search-forward which the other timestamp related
tests use.
---
testing/lisp/test-ox-html.el | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/testing/lisp/test-ox-html.el b/testing/lisp/test-ox-html.el
index 15b09a31f..fdd40ae98 100644
--- a/testing/lisp/test-ox-html.el
+++ b/testing/lisp/test-ox-html.el
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ SCHEDULED: <2025-03-26 Wed> DEADLINE: <2025-03-27 Thu 13:00> CLOSED: [2025-03-25
nil nil nil t)
(with-current-buffer export-buffer
(mapc (lambda (s)
- (should (= 1 (how-many (rx-to-string s)))))
+ (should (search-forward s nil t)))
'("<span class=\"timestamp-wrapper\"><time class=\"timestamp\" datetime=\"2025-06-25\">[2025-06-25 Wed]</time></span>"
"<span class=\"timestamp-wrapper\"><time class=\"timestamp\" datetime=\"2025-06-25T19:10:00\"><2025-06-25 Wed 19:10></time></span>"))))))
--
2.50.1