After a night's sleep: On Sat, 18 Oct 2025 at 19:25, Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <[email protected]> writes: > > >> configure the document's fonts using LaTeX's ~fontspec~ package. > >> This package assumes that the document is intended for an American > >> English context (i.e. header, figure, table names and typesetting > >> - options will be set for American English). > >> + options will be set for American English), possibly containing > >> + characters not covered by the default LaTeX fonts. > >> > >> Without this clarification, it was not very clear why one needs fontspec > >> if the document is already in American English.
I still strongly feel that "possibly containing..." is misleading (and possibly wrong). You don't need to mention this here and it is discussed in more detail when fallback fonts are explained. To achieve a more efficient communication here: 1. I would appretiate your help in deciding whether you want the LaTeX packages to be in monotype or just spelt out (babel vs. =babel= vs ~babel~) 2. It would also be helpful to understand the best way of handling the keyword vs. export setting issue. Best, /PA -- Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden, Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden Georg Kreisler "Sagen's Paradeiser" (ORF: Als Radiohören gefährlich war) => write BE! Year 1 of the New Koprocracy
