Wouldn’t it be clearer to use noezport only and leave comment as a word that 
can be part of the title?

/PA
Enviado desde mi iPhone

> El 12 nov 2025, a las 12:00, Andreas Matthias <[email protected]> 
> escribió:
> 
> I use :noexport: extensively and didn't want to mix it with comments. But 
> your
> idea set me on the right track:
> 
> (setq org-export-exclude-tags '("noexport" "comment"))
> 
> I didn't notice the subtle differences between COMMENT and :noexport: so far,
> so I guess I don't mind.
> 
> Andreas
> 
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 9:15 AM Christian Moe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <[email protected]> writes:
>> 
>>> Don't know, but it really feels soft of awkward that your heading can't 
>>> start with COMMENT.
>>> I've not used it in Org, but I do in other word processing setups, where 
>>> you get a file and
>>> you want to add temporary stuff at the end for inter-author communication 
>>> processes.
>> 
>> There's always the :noexport: tag, though. Andreas' example works fine
>> with noexport instead of COMMENT, resulting in:
>> 
>>    1. AAA
>>    2. CCC
>>    3. DDD
>>    4. EEE
>> 
>> (COMMENT and :noexport: do not have identical effects; e.g. COMMENT also
>> hides named blocks from Babel :var references, for some reason, but for
>> me that's usually a reason to prefer noexport, not a behavior I want.)
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Christian
> 

Reply via email to