Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: >> At some point I'd like to tackle Prolog, which is also abysmal. And >> ob-haskell doesn't play well with latest haskel-mode; I have to use a 10 yo >> version. Your thoughts on all the ob-<your obscure language here>? > > If you know bugs in ob-haskell (which *is* a part of Org mode), feel > free to report them. > > Whether you can send LLM-generated patches, it depends. > > You definitely cannot send complex patches. LLM-produced code is likely > public domain, and adding non-trivial amount of public domain code may > have implications on GPL licensing. Until GNU clarifies on these > implications with lawyers, we are putting large LLM contributions on > hold. The best I can suggest here is turning patches into third-party > packages - those are definitely not restricted in terms of what you can > use or not (all the legal burden will be on you, the author).
Assuming for a second the second the source of the code isn't by itself the issue. How can it be ok to submit code generated from closed source SAS LLVM's? That goes against what free software is from anyone's point of view in my opinion.
