Sure, please check out the patch. BTW, do we need to document the change in org-manual.org?
Lei Zhe On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 11:12 PM Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Lei Zhe <[email protected]> writes: > > >>For archiving, I can see how this may depend on user taste. > >>Could you please provide more details about your workflow? Do you really > >>need archived subtrees? > > Yes, in my workflow I do rely on archived subtrees. > > > > I maintain an accounting Org file that generates yearly journal files. > > After closing a fiscal year, I archive the corresponding headline. > > However, the ledger entries under that archived headline still need to > > be tangled, just like the current year's entries. > > ... > > Because this may ultimately be a matter of user preference, making the > > treatment of archived subtrees configurable (for example, via a > > defcustom) would allow users like me to adapt the behavior to their > > workflow without altering the current default for others. > > Sorry for the late reply. > > +1 > defcustom would make sense. > Similar to how there is `org-export-with-archived-trees'. > > -- > Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, > Org mode maintainer, > Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. > Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, > or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
0001-ob-tangle-Make-tangling-from-archived-trees-optional.patch
Description: Binary data
