Sławomir Grochowski <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Morgan, > > Thanks for the pointer — you're right, I should have looked at the > function signature more carefully before reaching for > `substring-no-properties'.
No you shouldn't have. You discovered an issue and found an appropriate fix. Your V1 patch was of sufficient quality to make it into Org. Honestly the commit message goes above and beyond what is expected and is really appreciated. I don't want you wasting time over analyzing every little thing. I mean go ahead and do it if that makes you happy, but know that it's not expected. > v2 inlined below. Everything looks good to me. Feel free to push it. Thanks for fixing this bug :)
