Hi Rohit, "Rohit Patnaik" <[email protected]> writes:
>> I wonder, why not use no check mark for optional items? > > That's certainly an option. However, when I export the list to HTML, it would > be > nice if (empty) checkbox on the optional item were preserved. Does this mean that the HTML output would produce this? - [X] Parent - [X] Child 1 - [X] Child 2 - [ ] Child 3 (optional) Yes, I would find that a bit disturbing. For what it's worth, the way I've dealt with optional items so far is by adding a strikethrough to emphasise items that are "checked" because no action is required, as shown here: - [X] Parent - [X] Child 1 - [X] Child 2 - [X] +Child 3+ (optional) 2 cts, -- Bastien
