Michael Gilbert <m...@gilbert.org> writes: > On Dec 3,2009, at 3:38 AM, andrea wrote: > > I'm not sure that emacs (ab)use is the right frame of reference > here. Shouldn't we be talking about interoperability standards here? > Orgmode supports the same core set of data that other todo list tools > and calendar tools support. In many cases, Orgmode can export > cleanly, as the OP suggested. In a few cases, it can import. Can that > be taken further? I just wanted to add my two cents for OM "playing > well with others" and I'm curious as to what people are trying. > > -- Michael
In theory you're right, exporting and publishing work really well. But if you want to collaborate with other people in my opinion you can't rely so much on importing/exporting. You would spend too much time to merge and fix manually stuff. I think that working with two products only (if the other one is a bit smart) using some elisp magic you can really create a mixed environment that works, but that's not a general solution. For example for the calendar. It would be nice to have a system where org-mode and $PROGRAM_X reads and writes at the same time on a webdav shared calendar. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
