Sorry folks,

It turns out I wasn't replying to the list. Here's the thread for posterity.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Cameron Horsburgh <cammobla...@gmail.com>
Date: 2010/1/18
Subject: Re: Editing body text in MobileOrg
To: Richard Moreland <r...@ncogni.to>


Hi Richard,

I've found the problem. It turns out that my file didn't have a .org
extension. Once I added that, everything worked fine. I knew it was
something simple...!

Thanks for your help and such a useful application.

2010/1/17 Richard Moreland <r...@ncogni.to>

Hmm, I just tried this as test.org and it worked:
>
> * Test
> | a | b | c |
> | d | e | f |
>
> Is your's different?  Can you send me a small sample that causes it to
> fail?
>
> On Jan 17, 2010, at 7:04 AM, Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your reply.
> >
> > I have tried preceding the table with a line:
> >
> > * table
> >
> > but this doesn't get me very far. The node shows up everywhere it is
> > supposed to, but the table is still missing.
> >
> > Strange!
> >
> > On Sunday, January 17, 2010, Richard Moreland <r...@ncogni.to> wrote:
> >> Do you have any * Node entries at all in that file?  If it is just an
> .org file with a table in it, you'll probably see nothing.
> >>
> >> The plain text/tables before the first node are just eaten up in the
> current code.
> >>
> >> I never really considered that use case, and to be honest I'm not too
> sure how to support it!  I'll have to give it some more thought.
> >>
> >> -Richard
> >>
> >> On Jan 17, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>>
> >>> I'm missing something really simple here, but I just can't put my
> finger on it.
> >>>
> >>> I want to use MobileOrg to record data that I can eventually upload to
> emacs. The data file (in emacs) consists of a single table. However, when I
> sync it to MobileOrg the file appears to be empty. The details page contains
> no text, and viewing as a document produces a blank page.
> >>>
> >>> All of my other files in MobileOrg work as expected, although they are
> more 'traditional' tree style outlines.
> >>>
> >>> What am I missing here?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cameron Horsburgh
> >>> blog: http://spiritcry.wordpress.com
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> >>> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> >>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> >>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Cameron Horsburgh
> > blog: http://spiritcry.wordpress.com
>
>


-- 


Cameron Horsburgh
blog: http://spiritcry.wordpress.com



-- 


Cameron Horsburgh
blog: http://spiritcry.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Reply via email to