Hi Carsten, hi all
Are there reasons to only narrow but not to widen columns?
I would like the behavior `fixed width' like
| year | boss | facility management assistant |
| | <30> | <30> |
|------+-------------------------------+--------------------------------|
| 2009 | Alice | Bob |
but with the current implementation get
| year | boss | facility management assistant |
| | <30> | <30> |
|------+-------+-------------------------------|
| 2009 | Alice | Bob |
which widens the column only if there is too less space left for the column
content.
As a comparison I can imagine four variants:
<..40> : `maximum width' (what <40> is today)
<30> : `fixed width'
<20..> : `minimum width' (no narrowing)
<20..40> : `width range' (minimum 20, up to 40, narrowing if even longer)
The most commonly used spreadsheet applications offer just one single variant
out of the above four (right?) and it is `fixed width'. My vote for org-table
would be the same: That it should support `fixed width' and that this is
sufficient as the only variant. What is the opinion of other users?
- Michael
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
