Matt Price wrote: >Just quickly -- so if I'm using wanderlust, will the resultant >message still be properly formatted?
This depends *entirely on recipients environment*. May be, may be not. Maybe the parts are displayed, maybe they are not: http://s1.directupload.net/images/user/100402/plz64u4a.png (second and fourth part NOT displayed) Parts of the mail will be rendered as plain text, others as html. Maybe different font sizes and shapes (plain text vs. html markup). Maybe the recipient cannot display images at all. Maybe recipient's mail program explodes: Heck, there weren't even tests to see how mailers other than Google webmail, GMX webmail (see above!), Gnus, Wanderlust, Thunderbird and Outlook Express 6 cope with these messages. Just consider this: Messaging might be WYSIWYG What *you* see is what *you* get But not WYSIWRG What *you* see is what *recipient* gets. When communication with others it's all about WRGIWYM What *recipient* gets is what *you* meant. @Erik: > Emacs is about giving users as much power and choice as possible, > even if that amounts to given them enough rope to hang themselves. Then please at least /tell/ users of org-mime that they might break their necks while just using org-mime to bundle message parts together. -- David -- OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber.... dmj...@jabber.org Email..... dm...@ictsoc.de
pgpMyYSDtRCYm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
