Russell Adams <rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com> writes: > FYI, > > That was from a ML post, I cannot take credit. Thanks to who posted > it, it helped me out!
No problem. > In response to the other, I just downloaded 6.36c from the website > *today* and had to apply that patch to make it work. OK, that makes sense, as I've just downloaded the 6.36c tarball to check and it does not contain the commit in question (144492025355). [...] >> > This issue was supposed to have been fixed by commit >> > 14449202535562b3d3d91c753fdead00a64caa79, see >> >> Russell's patch was just applied, let me know if it is unnecessary and >> should be reverted. So, John -- yes, could you revert that please as the issue has been fixed subsequent to 6.36. Could someone tell me how to find out which commit corresponds to a certain release (e.g. 6.36c)? Dan >> >> John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Emacs-orgmode mailing list >> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Russell Adams rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com > > PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3 http://www.adamsinfoserv.com/ > > Fingerprint: 1723 D8CA 4280 1EC9 557F 66E8 1154 E018 1160 DCB3 > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
